Fundación Cidaut
  contacto     ES | EN

Difusión y TTNoticias

imprimirimprimir
Understanding the advantages and costs of in-mold decorating.
Plastics Today , 13/12/2012

 

 

Mark Dirr, director of research and development for Xten Industries, a custom injection molding company in Kehosha, WI (www.xtenindustries.com), recently provided insight into how that company has created opportunities for new business and provided solutions to customers’ complex decorating requirements using in-mold decorating (IMD). Dirr gave his presentation at the recent IML/IMDCON, sponsored by AWA Alexander Watson Associates, in Rosemont, IL.
   
It’s key to understand what IMD brings to the table and the cost of that. There are a number of cost/benefit considerations:

    1. Differentiation – OEMs can get a huge amount of differentiation using IMD and the differentiation works both ways, for Xten and for its customers. “Once they decide to go with IMD, a whole range of new possibilities open up including decorative appeal, messaging, even function,” said Dirr. “It gives them an opportunity to bring a greater level of sophistication to what might be a fairly common or standard product. Or they can stretch their design capability and let their inner artistry loose."

 

    1. Quality – OEMs can get a higher level of quality with IMD or IML (in-mold labeling) as opposed to pad printing or painting. “From an economic point of view of IMD versus painting or printing, the process is more high speed, and the general quality really comes through when you’re looking at complex printed images,” said Dirr. “For example, with images of some flowers you get a full, bright photographic image with IMD that you can’t get with the paint process, pad printing or silk screening.” 

 

    1. Cost– OEMs need to understand not only the cost structure of IMD/IML but the benefits as well. “You can have significant costs for an upgrade of quality, but that also depends on which method of IMD you choose,” said Dirr. “With flat sheet IMD, cost comes mainly in the piece parts, in the film itself. Other than that, there’s the automation and handling that is required with the IML process. We try to use automation on every IMD job because hand-loading is costly. A flat IML part is easy, but the 3D thermoformed parts are more difficult, depending on how the shapes nest together. Flatter surfaces and gentle curves are easier than complex 3D shapes. Wrapping parting lines requires hand loading.”

      With thermoformed IML (T-IML), the label itself has to be thermoformed. There’s also the additional thermoform tooling and the match-metal die to cut the parts from the sheet, which can be fairly expensive depending on how complex the shape is. Dirr has worked with a number of automotive parts that use the IML/IMD process and those typically have extremely complex shapes and require a number of different films.

 

  1. Timing– Because there are multiple tools and automation involved in the IML/IMD process, it is critical to understand the time that it takes to pull this type of project together. “It’s critical to communicate with customers the time involved for these projects,” Dirr said. “In particular the de-bug stage is time consuming due to the number of components involved in the process.

    In the case of T-IML, Dirr explained that Xten usually kicks off the production tool, thermoform tool and matched metal die at the same time. However they cannot be completed together as fitting needs to be done. This adds more de-bug due to the fact that the match metal die or ‘trim’ die can’t be finished until the injection mold is done. “We can go so far with the tooling then we have to wait until the mold is complete,” Dirr added. “We can work with prototypes up front and go with hand-cut trimming for the thermoformed pieces for tryouts. Then we finish the thermoformed tool, the match metal dies, and do the final fitting.”

Educating the customer on the benefits, costs, and complexity of the product using IML/IMD can be challenging. Some of the issues surrounding IMD include choosing the right kind of IMD and optimum substrate materials are the beginning. “We had a project that used a 30% GF high-temp material, and glass prevents good adhesion of the label,” Dirr explained. “One of the problems we ran into is that the insert in the part acts as an insulator between the label and the part, and we don’t have control over how much glass comes to the surface. So we have to run hotter than normal to achieve a quality surface and good adhesion of the label.”

Dirr also suggested that choosing a supplier with expertise in IML/IMD and that can deliver the product on time is critical to the success of the project. The label is just as important as the plastic substrate material, so making sure that the label supplier has the type of equipment necessary to provide the labels is also important.

ILM label in place and ready to be molded into a functional part.

“Not all label suppliers are doing both IML and T-IML labels,” Dirr noted. “Supplier expertise is important, as is the type of equipment they have. For example, digital printing provides more flexibility, and enhances the speed at which you can change over because the label supplier simply prints a different art file each time. Unfortunately, there are no UV inks used in digital IML printing at this time so if you need UV resistance and digital printing you have to coat the labels after the fact—lamination or a secondary coating. That adds cost.”

Designing a product specifically for IMD is critical. “If the product has ribs under an IML, using the 60% wall thickness ratio rule might not be good enough,” said Dirr. “The in-mold label takes away wall thickness so you subtract the IML thickness from the wall,” he advised.

If a really glossy in-mold label is being used, Dirr suggested that a different wall thickness ratio might have to be used. “In our experience, sink marks show up easier with glossy labels so it’s best to take the ratio down to a lower percentage. I’ve used 40% and it works great. That’s subject to change depending on other factors, but that’s a good rule of thumb.”

Performing a material flow analysis prior to the mold build is critical for successful IML/IMD. “Gate location and material shear can be a problem,” said Dirr. “You need to know how the material is flowing into the mold so that the label or decorative film stays in place." Xten sub-contracts the analysis to “good suppliers” of that service, and does this analysis on all but the simplest projects.

“You want to make sure you’re gating in the center of the label so the material flows to the edges to get a uniform lay-down of the label,” Dirr said. “We can’t always do that, which means we have to get into some tricks—which we developed as a proprietary process—to achieve what we need. 

"We typically do an analysis on a part to detect any problems. Once we determined we can fill it, we looked for areas of high shear that could burn the label and result in cosmetic issues, gas traps, etc. All the things that you’d be looking for normally are that much more critical in IML. Venting is very critical. Poor venting can lead to burn marks and degradation of the label and adhesion layers.”

Gating is important as well. “If you use multiple gates you can get a crease in the IML part.  Then you may have to use sequential gating in a hot runner system for good IML/IMD results,” Dirr advised. “So far we’ve been able to do all of our parts with a single gate.”

Fundación Cidaut (Sede Central)
Parque Tecnológico de Boecillo, Plaza Vicente
Aleixandre Campos nº 2

47151 Boecillo (Valladolid) Spain
Cidaut Latinoamérica
1er. Retorno Osa Menor No. 2, Oficina #403
Col. Reserva territorial Atlixcayotl, C.P. 72810
San Andrés Cholula, Puebla, México.
Cidaut Deutschland GmbH
Schlüterstrasse 17
10625 Berlin
Colaboraciones:
Red de Puntos de Información
© 2017 Fundación Cidaut  |  Aviso legal  |  Política de privacidad